TOP

Online First

Original Article
Influence of interruption of oral mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis on outcomes after single cord blood transplantation
Kahori Fukushi1, Maki Monna-Oiwa2, Seiko Kato2, Masamichi Isobe2, Seiichiro Kuroda1, Yasuhito Nannya2, Satoshi Takahashi3, Takaaki Konuma2

1Department of Pharmacy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

2Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

3Division of Clinical Precision Research Platform, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Keywords
mycophenolate mofetil, graft-versus-host disease, cord blood transplantation, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, interruption
Submitted:December 12, 2023
Accepted:January 18, 2024
Published online:April 19, 2024

Abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, is used as the prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Compared to intravenous methotrexate (MTX), MMF is associated with a lower incidence of mucositis and shorter time for hematopoietic engraftment but comparable incidence of acute GVHD, resulting in the preferred use of MMF for GVHD prophylaxis in elderly patients or those undergoing cord blood transplantation (CBT). Although several studies have evaluated the clinical impact of MTX omission due to toxicity after allogeneic HCT, the impact of oral MMF interruption for GVHD prophylaxis on transplant outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed the consecutive data of adult patients who underwent single-unit unrelated CBT and received oral MMF in combination with cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis at our hospital. Among the 53 patients, the planned dose of MMF was interrupted in 14 with a median of 19.5 d (range, 3-27 d) of CBT. In multivariate analysis, MMF interruption, which was treated as a time-dependent covariate, was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 5.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-14.43; P < 0.001) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.99-28.79; P = 0.002). Further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm the clinical significance of oral MMF interruption in GVHD prophylaxis.

PDF

News

Online ISSN:2432-7026