TOP

Online First

Case Report
Successful Neutrophil Engraftment with Continued Ruxolitinib in Cord Blood Transplantation
Tomohiro Nagano1, Takumi Kondo1, Ryuichiro Hiyama1, Daisuke Ikeda1, Kenta Hayashino1, Yusuke Inoue1, Masaya Ueno1, Yayoi Ueda1, Saya Kubota1, Hiroki Kobayashi1, Keisuke Seike1, Hideaki Fujiwara1, Noboru Asada1, Daisuke Ennishi1,2, Keiko Fujii1,3, Nobuharu Fujii1,4, Ken-ichi Matsuoka1,5, Yoshinobu Maeda1

1Department of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan

2Center for Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan

3Division of Clinical Laboratory, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan

4Division of Transfusion, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan

5Department of Hematology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan

Keywords
cord blood transplantation, graft-versus-host disease, neutrophil engraftment, ruxolitinib, case report
Submitted: May 28, 2025
Accepted: August 4, 2025
Published online: October 17, 2025

Abstract

The Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway is crucial for immune function and hematopoiesis, which partly explains why cytopenia is a major adverse effect of ruxolitinib, a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor. Hematologic toxicity restricts the use of ruxolitinib during the pre-engraftment phase of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. While some reports have described its use in peripheral blood and bone marrow transplantation, its application in cord blood transplantation (CBT) remains unknown. Herein, we report two cases of CBT in which ruxolitinib was administered to treat GVHD after prior allogeneic transplantation. In Case 1, a patient underwent a third transplant for acute myeloid leukemia, and in Case 2, a patient received CBT for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder following transplantation for classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved in both cases, and Case 2 developed a pre-engraftment immune reaction. Platelet and red blood cell engraftment did not occur in either case, likely due to underlying comorbidities or limited survival, rather than the effects of ruxolitinib. This is the first report documenting successful neutrophil engraftment in CBT with concurrent ruxolitinib administration, suggesting its potential feasibility during the pre-engraftment phase. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its effects on multilineage hematopoietic recovery, infections, GVHD, and relapse risk.

PDF

Search

Volume / Issue
Article Type
Author
Search word

News

Online ISSN:2432-7026