Volume 8 (2025) Issue 2 No.2 Pages 195-199
Abstract
Background: Co-occurrence of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) and ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in immunocompromised patients.
Case Report: A 47-year-old Filipino woman with transfusion-dependent intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was admitted to our institution for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). During the preparation for allogeneic HSCT, she developed several erythematous ulcerated lesions on the lower extremities, which were initially managed as PG. Subsequent febrile episodes and worsening lesions with isolated Escherichia coli in blood and tissue cultures lead to the diagnosis of EG complicating PG. She was treated through targeted antibiotics, wound debridement, and proper wound care. After the resolution of the infection and upon starting low-dose immunosuppression followed by allogeneic HSCT, her left leg lesions showed progressive improvement. Six months after HSCT, lesions were completely resolved with complete epithelialization.
Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis and integrated management of complex conditions like PG and EG in immunocompromised patients. The successful resolution of lesions post-HSCT underscores the potential curative role of stem cell transplantation in managing MDS-associated PG.
Introduction
Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is an inflammatory, non-infectious ulcerative skin condition requiring immunosuppressive therapy1–6. Ecthyma gangrenosum (EG) is an infectious, ulcerative skin condition often associated with bacterial infection requiring antibiotics and surgical debridement7,8. Co-occurrence of PG and EG complicates diagnosis and management, especially in immunocompromised patients9.
Case Report
A 47-year-old Filipino woman presented with a 1-year history of easy fatigability in March 2020. Her comorbidities included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with good control, Hypertension stage 2, and past Hepatitis B infection. Initial workup showed pancytopenia with hemoglobin ranging from 40-60 g/L, white blood cells 2-3 × 109/L, and platelets 10-30 × 109/L. Bone marrow studies revealed hypocellular marrow with trilineage hematopoiesis without significant blasts. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was negative for chromosomal abnormalities: 5q-, -5, 7q-, -7, 20q- and +8, suggesting at least a normal karyotype, despite the unavailability of karyotyping at that time. She was diagnosed with intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (IPSS-R 3.3). After treatment with lenalinomide, azacitidine, decitabine, and eltrombopag in the past 2 years, she remained transfusion-dependent, leading to an Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) recommendation.
Ten months pre-HSCT in November 2022, she developed left leg cellulitis (Figure 1A[A]), progressing to multiple ulcerated lesions approximately 3 × 4 cm (Figure 1A[B]). Upon wound debridement, biopsy showed pyogenic granuloma with Escherichia coli (E. coli) growth, treated with culture-guided cefixime for 7 days. Seven months pre-HSCT, she was admitted to our institution for pre-transplantation workups. She presented with progressively enlarging, painful, violaceous-erythematous, necrotic ulcers on her left leg and foot, with the largest approximately 5 × 4 cm. Baseline laboratory exams revealed pancytopenia, normal bleeding parameters, procalcitonin, and chemistries. Plain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of her left leg revealed cutaneous to subcutaneous thickening without evidence of osteomyelitis. On repeat debridement (Figure 1A[C]), histopathology showed dermal inflammation with several inflammatory infiltrates (Figure 2). Tissue cultures and special stains, including blood cultures, were negative. Hence, PG was mainly considered.
Six months pre-HSCT, she had a fever (Tmax 38.8℃) with the progression of necrotic areas of left leg lesions (Figure 1A[D]). Blood and tissue cultures upon repeat debridement grew E. coli. She was managed as EG, complicating PG, and culture-guided aztreonam was added to ceftazidime and completed for 14 days. After the resolution of the infection, wound debridement was stopped as lesions increased to 5.5 × 5.9 cm. Thereafter, left leg lesions remained stable (Figure 1A[E]).
Three months pre-HSCT, low-dose immunosuppression with oral tacrolimus (target trough level 3-5 ng/mL, titrated to approximately 0.03mg/kg) and mycophenolate mofetil (titrated to approximately 5mg/kg) were started for PG. Prophylactic acyclovir, levofloxacin, itraconazole, and entecavir were also started. One-month pre-HSCT, she underwent low-dose desensitization with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin (Ig) due to high ABO titer and high levels of non-donor specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. After two months of immunosuppression, left leg lesions improved (Figure 1A[F]). The patient (O+, cytomegalovius (CMV) IgG+) subsequently underwent matched related peripheral blood stem cell transplantation with her brother as donor (B+, CMV IgG-) (11/12 HLA-matched with a single antigen mismatch at the HLA-A locus and completely mismatched at HLA-DPB1 locus), after reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine (25mg/m2/day) from day-8 to day-4, busulfan (3.2mg/kg/day) from day-4 to day-3, cyclophosphamide (25mg/kg/day) from day-2 to day-1. She received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)(40mg/kg) on day+3 and day+4, followed by tacrolimus (0.015mg/kg) from day+5 onwards and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)(15mg/kg) from day+5 to day+35 as graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Post-HSCT complications include febrile neutropenia and transient left leg myositis. Septic work up was unremarkable; empiric cefepime and amikacin were completed for 14 days, and micafungin was shifted back to itraconazole upon lysis of fever on day+13 post-HSCT. Left leg myositis resolved after 7 days of vancomycin. Neutrophils engrafted on day+21 and platelets on day+26. Pre-emptive CMV Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) done every week post-HSCT was negative up to the time of discharge on day+37 post-HSCT. Following discharge post-HSCT, the patient underwent outpatient monitoring twice weekly for about a month, then at least weekly until day 100, including blood counts, blood chemistry, and wound care. Weekly CMV PCR testing continued until day 100, with preemptive Valganciclovir initiated for CMV PCR levels > 500 + 1,000 copies/mL. Monitoring was based on CMV mismatch, mismatched related HSCT, and PTCy. Red cell engraftment occurred 2 months post-HSCT, with the conversion of the patient's blood type from O Rh+ to B Rh+, similar to her donor's. The delay was attributed to an ABO mismatch. There was full donor chimerism on day+28 and day+100 based on short tandem repeat (STR) analysis and FISH XY analysis (female to male) (Figure 1B). PG lesions continued improving with blood count recovery (Figure 1A[G], [H]). Six months post-HSCT, PG lesions resolved (Figure 1A[I]). At the time of reporting, 12 months post-HSCT, there was no recurrence of her PG lesions, and MDS remained in remission.
Discussion
PG has unclear pathogenesis involving immune complex-mediated neutrophil hyperactivity1,2. It is linked to underlying systemic diseases and myeloid malignancies such as myeloproliferative neoplasms or MDS
While PG is a non-infectious skin condition, EG is a rare skin condition from severe infection commonly caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), and rarely, also by other gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli as seen in our case, including gram-positive and viral pathogens7. It also starts as hemorrhagic pustules, progressing into ulcerations and eschars with an erythematous halo. Diagnosis is clinical, relying on the appearance of the lesions, biopsies, tissue, and blood cultures. Treatment includes administration of culture-guided antibiotics and, if necessary, surgical debridement to remove necrotic tissue. Bacteremia and delayed diagnosis can lead to poorer prognosis. Non-pseudomonal EG caused by
Our patient had PG, but subsequent febrile episodes, E. coli bacteremia, and worsening of lesions led to a revised diagnosis of EG, complicating PG along its course. A sudden appearance or progression of a necrotic eschar in a healing PG ulcer should raise suspicion for EG or other gangrenous infections, necessitating a repeat skin biopsy and cultures9. Surgical debridement was done cautiously because while it is beneficial to EG, it is controversial to PG since it might trigger pathergy that can lead to poor outcomes3,5,9. In the interim, left leg lesions remained stable until low-dose immunosuppression was started 3 months prior to HSCT for PG, upon ensuring that there were no signs of infection. Consequently, there was a significant improvement and eventual resolution of the left leg lesions 6 months post-HSCT, which further strengthened the diagnosis of PG complicated by EG along the patient's course.
The choice of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) with fludarabine-busulfan-cyclophosphamide in this case was influenced by the need to minimize further immunosuppression due to a recent active infection
While PTCy was originally established for haploidentical transplantation, its application in our case could be justified by multiple immunological risk factors: the presence of a single HLA mismatch, major ABO incompatibility, high levels of non-donor specific anti-HLA antibodies, and the use of peripheral blood stem cells as the graft source, which contains higher T cell doses compared to bone marrow. These factors collectively increase the risk of GVHD. Additionally, given the patient's complex pre-transplant conditions, including PG and EG, the selective timing of PTCy's immunosuppression might offer advantages in balancing GVHD prevention while allowing immune recovery13.
Early consideration of HSCT is crucial in PG cases associated with MDS. While immunosuppressive drugs may provide temporary control, allogeneic HSCT remains the only curative treatment for MDS4. Previous studies have demonstrated successful treatment of PG associated with MDS using HSCT4,14, highlighting its role in resolving complex inflammatory conditions linked to hematologic disorders. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of non-Pseudomonal EG caused by E. coli complicating PG in an MDS patient. The patient was successfully treated with culture-guided intravenous antibiotics and subsequent allogeneic HSCT. This unique, infectious complication underscores the significance of individualized therapeutic strategies, integrating targeted anti-infective treatments with definitive HSCT to address both systemic disease and associated inflammatory conditions. Our conjecture is that the immune-regulatory effects of HSCT, combined with hematologic recovery, played a critical role in the resolution of PG in this patient.
Conclusion
Successful resolution of PG complicated by EG following wound care, culture-guided therapy, immunosuppression, and subsequent allogeneic HSCT underscores the importance of accurate diagnosis and integrated treatment. This case demonstrates HSCT's potential curative impact in managing complex inflammatory skin conditions associated with hematologic disorders, providing valuable insights for similar future cases.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available on the website.
Author Contributions
The paper was authored by CFVT, LBB, and
References
1.Marzano AV, Borghi A, Meroni PL, Cugno M. Pyoderma gangrenosum and its syndromic forms: evidence for a link with autoinflammation. Br J Dermatol. 2016; 175: 882-91.
2.DeFilippis EM, Feldman SR, Huang WW. The genetics of pyoderma gangrenosum and implications for treatment: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2015; 172: 1487-97.
3.Taheri A, Mansoori P, Sharif M. Wound Debridement in Pyoderma Gangrenosum. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2024; 37: 107-11.
4.Yamanaka K, Kuniyuki S, Maekawa N, Yoshida Y, Teshima H. Pyoderma gangrenosum with myelodysplastic syndrome treated with analogous bone marrow transplantation. Acta Derm Venereol. 2009; 89: 105-6.
5.von den Driesch P. Pyoderma gangrenosum: a report of 44 cases with follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 1997; 137: 1000-5.
6.Koca E, Duman AE, Cetiner D, Buyukasik Y, Haznedaroglu IC, Uner A, et al. Successful treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome-induced pyoderma gangrenosum. Neth J Med. 2006; 64: 422-4.
7.Reich HL, Williams Fadeyi D, Naik NS, Honig PJ, Yan AC. Nonpseudomonal ecthyma gangrenosum. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 50 (Suppl): S114-7.
8.Firoz M, Jamal A, Ur Rehman SI. Non-pseudomonal Ecthyma Gangrenosum and Idiopathic Myelofibrosis in a Two-Year-Old Girl. Cureus. 2018; 10: e2441.
9.Yang CC, Hsieh FS, Lee JY. Pyoderma gangrenosum complicated by ecthyma gangrenosum. Br J Dermatol. 2004; 150: 1025-6.
10.Słonimska P, Sachadyn P, Zieliński J, Skrzypski M, Pikuła M. Chemotherapy-mediated complications of Wound Healing: An Understudied Side Effect. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2024; 13: 187-99.
11.Itonaga H, Miyazaki Y, Fujioka M, Aoki J, Doki N, Nishida T, et al. Prognostic impact of the conditioning intensity on outcomes after allogeneic transplantation for MDS with low blasts: a nationwide retrospective study by the adult MDS working group of the Japan Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. “Abstract” Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024; 59: 1107-17.
12.Lim Z, Brand R, Martino R, van Biezen A, Finke J, Bacigalupo A, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for patients 50 years or older with myelodysplastic syndromes or secondary acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 405-11.
13.Kanakry CG, O'Donnell PV, Furlong T, de Lima MJ, Wei W, Medeot M, et al. Multi-institutional study of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as single-agent graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using myeloablative busulfan and fludarabine conditioning. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 3497-505.
14.Barrett AJ, Savani BN. Allogenic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome. Semin Hematol. 2008; 45: 49-59.
Search
News
